Switzerland is having a referendum on saving cow and goat horns … – CNN International

Sunday’s referendum is part of a decade-long campaign by farmer Armin Capaul, 67, on whether to subsidize farmers who let their cows’ and goats’ horns grow naturally, said Kaspar Schuler, the campaign director of Capaul’s initiative and former head of Greenpeace in Switzerland.
Schuler says around 90% of Swiss cows, which are a national symbol, are de-horned or genetically hornless.
Advocates for de-horning say it reduces injuries to animals, but the farmer wants to change that as he believes “cows and communicate” with each other with their horns, Schuler said.
Capaul wants the government to pay farmers $191 annual subsidy per every horned cow or goat. The government is against the motion, saying it would cost tens of millions to pay farmers that subsidy, Reuters reports.
Capaul’s journey began nine years ago when he gave control of his cow farm to his son in northwestern Switzerland and began lobbying for horns on livestock.
“We must respect cows as they are. Leave them their horns. When you look at them they always hold their head high and are proud. When you remove the horns, they are sad,” Schuler told Reuters this week.
When lobbying failed, Capaul managed to collect the 100,000 signatures needed to trigger a national vote.
Schuler, who decribes his old friend Capaul as a “hippy,” said that no one expected him to collect that many signatures.
Some speculate that the farmer’s campaign will be backed by animal welfare groups against de-horning — which sees a sedated calf’s horn buds burned with a hot iron.
But Capaul is not convinced the “yes” campaign has their vote: “Swiss animal protection organizations said it [the motion] wasn’t radical enough… they wanted a ban on the ironing or cutting of horns.”
Nonetheless, latest polling numbers seen by Reuters say the vote is too close to call and Schuler is uncertain of a win.
Horned cows are used to market Swiss tourism and brands, but Schuler is careful not to say but Schuler insists this is not a nationalist campaign.
“A lot of [our supporters] are simple people from somewhere in the Swiss mountains who are close to nature and animals,” he said.
The benchmark is high, he said, but “since the Swiss cow is a national symbol it could work.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Swiss to Vote on Cow Horn Removal Issue – Voice of America

Swiss citizens will vote Sunday on an issue involving cows that has divided the country.

Voters will decide if farmers can receive government aid for not removing the horns of their cows.

Cows are an important part of the nation’s milk industry. They are also a national symbol for Switzerland and draw visitors to the country.

Farmer Armin Capaul began the effort to keep horns on cows nine years ago. Capaul told Reuters that “listening” to his cows incited him to act. When his campaign to persuade politicians failed, Capaul collected more than 100,000 signatures to hold a national vote on the issue.

He is seeking to have the government give farmers yearly payments of about $200 for each horned cow they have. Capaul says the money is needed to help famers pay for extra costs linked to keeping horned animals. Having more space for the animals helps prevent fights and injuries involving cow horns. Capaul hopes the government assistance will reduce the number of dehorned cows.

Capaul says horns help cows communicate and keep the right body temperature. “We must respect cows as they are,” he told Reuters on his small farm in northwestern Switzerland. “Leave them their horns. When you look at them they always hold their head high and are proud. When you remove the horns, they are sad,” he said.

In this Aug. 23, 2011, file photo, dairy cows graze on grass in the Emmental region of Switzerland. (AP Photo/Mark D. Carlson)

In this Aug. 23, 2011, file photo, dairy cows graze on grass in the Emmental region of Switzerland. (AP Photo/Mark D. Carlson)

About 75 percent of Swiss cows are dehorned or genetically hornless.

Capaul’s plan would require a change to the Swiss constitution. The government opposes the idea. It estimates the assistance would represent about $30 million a year of the country’s agriculture budget. Many farmers have also expressed concerns about how the country would pay for the proposed assistance.

Groups opposed to dehorning have supported Capaul’s campaign. Dehorning involves burning a young cow’s small horns with a hot iron. Critics say the process is painful and unnatural. But supporters say it is no worse than castrating male cats or dogs.

Farmer Stefan Gilgen has 48 cows that provide about 260 gallons of milk a day. He told Reuters that his cows get along better without horns. “If cows have horns, the danger of injuries to the animals and humans is greater,” he said.

Gilgen added that he does not agree that a vote should be taken to change the constitution for such an issue. “Each farm should decide for itself. We have other problems in agriculture,” he said.

The latest public opinion studies have suggested Sunday’s vote will be very close.

I’m Bryan Lynn.

Bryan Lynn wrote this story for VOA Learning English, based on reports from Reuters and the Swiss Broadcasting Corporation. Caty Weaver was the editor.

We want to hear from you. Write to us in the Comments section, and visit our Facebook page.


Words in This Story

referendum n. an election in which people in an area vote on a specific issue

horn n. ​one of the hard pointed parts that grows on the head of some animals (such as cattle, goats, or sheep)​

lobby v. efforts made to try to influence government policy

proud adj. feeling pleased and happy about one’s self

castrate v. to remove part of male reproductive organs

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Swiss on horns of dilemma in cow welfare referendum – Financial Times

On a farm in Rheinau, northern Switzerland, Martin Ott admires the pale, curved horns of dozens of cows contentedly munching hay — and sees not just an Alpine icon but a sign of order in the world.

“The horn was always a symbol that nature has its own dignity,” Mr Ott says.

Now the horn is also political. In one of Switzerland’s frequent national referendums on Sunday, voters are in effect being asked to pay for horns, by deciding whether the state should subsidise farmers who choose not to remove animals’ horns or eliminate them via breeding.

Because of such techniques three-quarters of Swiss cows, and one-third of goats, have no horns. Advocates of removal argue it makes livestock easier to keep and reduces injuries to humans and animals.

But Mr Ott, who runs a green farming school in Rheinau and has written a book on “understanding cows”, said a Yes vote would correct an evil of modern agriculture.

Horns are used for scratching, cooling, feeling and communicating, he said as he walked through the farm’s cattle shed. “The horns amplify what they want to say. It has to do with dignity.”

Switzerland’s system of direct democracy requires only 100,000 signatures for a proposition to be put to the vote, and in the past has led to outcomes such as legally binding curbs on executive pay and road haulage through the Alps.

Sunday’s vote coincides with a separate referendum on a proposal from the powerful, nationalist Swiss People’s Party to assert the supremacy of the Swiss constitution over international treaties. The “self-determination initiative” is meant to bolster Switzerland’s independence and national identity, even if it threatens relations with the EU.

The “cow horn” vote has similar ambitions, said Mr Ott, who launched the referendum initiative with Armin Capaul, a 67-year old farmer from Jura in western Switzerland. “It is self-determination for cows.”

His initiative found the backing needed to go ahead in a country whose landscape was largely shaped by cow pastures. Until industrialisation in the 19th century, “the cow was the most important economic entity in Switzerland,” according to Marc Valance, author of Die Schweizer Kuh, which chronicles the animal’s importance as an “unofficial national symbol”.

Historically, the horned cow reflected Swiss independence and military strength. It has also epitomised “motherly characteristics — love, milk and looking after calves,” said Mr Valance. The cow “became a symbol that held the Swiss confederation together, it symbolised unity”.

Opinion polls suggest Sunday’s vote will be close. The motion has been worded to maximise support: it does not ban horn culling, for instance.

Martin Ott: ‘The horn was always a symbol that nature has its own dignity’

Switzerland’s government urges a No vote, disputing the idea that cows suffer significantly without their horns and saying decisions should be left to farmers.

Johann Schneider-Ammann, agriculture minister, said that horned cows often needed to be tied up — and that for animal welfare a Yes vote would be an own goal. The government says the constitution already requires it to support animal friendly farming.

Images of cows used extensively to market Swiss products and tourism normally have horns: the question for voters on Sunday is whether agriculture should more closely reflect that marketed ideal. “A cow without horns is not a real cow. It’s a freak,” said Mr Valance. “In the real world, a minority of cows in Switzerland have horns — but in adverts they all do.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Cow-Horn Vote Parades Switzerland's Populist Safety Valve – Bloomberg

[unable to retrieve full-text content]


Cow-Horn Vote Parades Switzerland's Populist Safety Valve
Armin Capaul, an anti-establishment protester-turned farmer, has proposed state subsidies for livestock owners who keep the horns on their cows and goats, saying the practice of de-horning is painful for the animals. The vote is the latest in a series
Switzerland to vote on whether to save cow hornseuronews
Cows with or without horns? Switzerland goes to referendum amid cruelty concernsDaily Sabah
In Switzerland will host “cow” referendumThe Siver Times

all 14 news articles »

Source link

Search for Coco, the cow that hopped a farm fence, comes to a sad ending – CTV News

The Canadian Press</span>

Published Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:23AM EST

Last Updated Wednesday, November 21, 2018 12:52PM EST

CONCEPTION BAY SOUTH, N.L. — The search for a stubborn cow that hopped a fence at a Newfoundland farm has come to a sad end.

Coco the cow was put down when she was discovered last weekend not far the farm she bolted from in Conception Bay South, 30 kilometres west of St. John’s.

Farmer Barry Scott said veterinarians used enough tranquilizers to bring down two moose, but when those failed to control Coco’s behaviour she had to be put down.

"She was determined not to get caught. I don’t know what else we could have done," Scott said.

Scott was sad to see Coco’s story end without bringing her home to the farm.

He had hoped to bring her back over the course of the week-long search but he said he didn’t want anyone to get hurt in the process.

"She just wouldn’t co-operate at all so it meant for a harrowing time," he said.

"It never ended the way I wanted it to end but that’s all you can do about that stuff."

The 450-kilogram black cow hopped the fence a few weeks ago and appeared determined to evade capture.

Scott asked the public not to intervene during the search after a man was hurt in a tussle while trying to apprehend Coco.

Scott raised Coco from when she was a calf, and in a lifetime of farming he’d never had a cow escape before.

The farmer is taking some time to consider his options around buying a new cow or cutting his losses as he nears retirement age.

"Everything will come out in the wash after a while," he said.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

BC cow slaughtered in Alberta found to have bovine tuberculosis – Globalnews.ca

An investigation has been launched by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) after a case of bovine tuberculosis (bovine TB) was found on a farm in the southern interior of B.C.

In a statement, the CFIA says it cannot provide more information relating to location for confidentiality reasons.

On Tuesday, it did confirm the cow was slaughtered in Alberta.

An official with Alberta Beef Producers would not confirm which of Alberta’s four federally regulated plants the cow was slaughtered at.

The CFIA says a mature beef cow was presented for slaughter on Oct. 26. A post-mortem examination found the presence of granulomatous lesions in the mediastinal lymph nodes, lungs and liver. The carcass was condemned, and no portions of the animal entered the food chain.

This was a federally registered slaughterhouse so all animals are inspected to ensure they are handled humanely and meet all regulatory requirements and laws.

WATCH: (Aired Oct. 31, 2016) What is bovine tuberculosis?

Story continues below

Samples from the cow were shipped off for testing and confirmed a case of bovine TB.

“A this point there’s no evidence to connect it to anything in Alberta or the previous case in 2016,” Alberta Beef Producers beef production specialist Karin Schmid said Tuesday.

“They’re in a really tough situation because [the farm the cow came from] may end up losing that entire herd, that’s part of our control procedures for tuberculosis, is depopulation and eradication.

“That’s devastating to lose that livelihood, to lose all that work that’s been put into it. The bright side is that the wider industry is not affected by this case.”

The CFIA says Canada’s international status is currently bovine TB-free and these findings should not affect Canada’s current international status.

According to the CFIA, bovine TB is a “reportable disease in Canada and has been subject to a mandatory national eradication program since 1923. While Canada is considered to be officially free of bovine TB today, isolated cases may occur. There is no risk to the food supply or to human health from this case.”

Humans can contract bovine TB but it is very rare. Exposure can only occur through the passage of fluids from an animal to an open skin sore, extended close contact with an animal with active respiratory TB or by drinking unpasteurized milk from an infected animal.

Bovine tuberculosis outbreak in Alberta in 2017

The CFIA has begun tracing movements of the animal in the infected herd to try to identify the source and any potential spread of the disease.

As the investigation is in the early stages, the exact number of herds involved and the time to complete the investigation is not yet known.

— With files from Heide Pearson

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

'Holy Cow, No One's Done This!' – Forbes

Move over Bill Gates and Michael Dell, computerdom’s newest magnate is just 27. Joe Liemandt is out to change the way we buy and sell things.

By Josh McHugh


This story originally appeared in the 6-9-1996 issue of Forbes. This republished web version accompanies a 2018 profile of Joe Liemandt, who has returned to the ranks of the world’s richest people with a new tech empire. ___________________________________________________________

IN JANUARY 1990, 21-year-old Joseph Liemandt telephoned his parents from Palo Alto, Calif. Joe, an economics major, was dropping out of Stanford University just a few months before graduation. He wanted to start his own software company. “You’re a moron,” growled his father, Gregory Liemandt, a highly successful businessman. Gregory pleaded with his son to finish his degree, but Joe wouldn’t yield. He had a hot idea and the idea couldn’t wait until graduation.

“My market window’s closing!” he told his father, and the next day he threw himself completely into running the software business he had started six months earlier with a handful of schoolmates.

A few months after first profiling Joe Liemandt, Forbes put the 28-year-old entrepreneur on the cover of that year's Forbes 400.

A few months after first profiling Joe Liemandt, Forbes put the 28-year-old entrepreneur on the cover of that year’s Forbes 400.

Six years have elapsed and Joe’s now 27. Dad died in the meantime, but not before becoming both proud and supportive of his rebellious son, whose Trilogy Development Group of Austin, Tex. has 200 employees, and is in the process of hiring another 100. Still private, Trilogy Development — FORBES estimates — had revenues of $ 70 million last year, and earned about $ 20 million before taxes. This year revenues will probably top $ 120 million. Based on Wall Street’s valuations of publicly owned software companies with similar profiles, Trilogy could be worth $ 1 billion, given or take a couple hundred million, if Liemandt wanted to cash out or raise capital — which he doesn’t.

What was the “market window” that led Joe Liemandt to drop out of college?

“I knew when I got to college I was going to start a software company,” Liemandt says. “I started doing tons of research. I’d sit in the library going through lists of the top 50 software companies.” He did part-time consulting jobs for Palo Alto computer companies during the academic year and the intervening summers. On these jobs he began to notice that when he ordered computer equipment, the shipments often arrived late, or with parts that were missing or incompatible with his computers. Smart technology companies were dumb when it came to selling and delivering their products. So he began to study what is called sales configuration — how orders are processed. He was surprised at how primitive the process was. Much of it was handwritten, using cumbersome inventory manuuals and often requiring lengthy consultations between a company’s salespeople and its engineers.

As he tells the story, Liemandt’s initially calm demeanor changes. He begins rapidly clicking the pen he is holding, then suddenly pushes his chair back from a conference table and springs to a whiteboard. “I focused my research,” he says. Grabbing a red marker, he begins to sketch a rectangular diagram representing the cost structure of the typical U.S. manufacturing company. About half of the average manufacturer’s noncapital spending budget, Liemandt says, is made up of general and administrative costs, R&D expense and manufacturing costs. All of those areas, he adds, have been automated and computerized for years.

Now the punch line: “The rest of their budgets — more than 40% — the manufacturers spend on sales and marketing,” he exclaims, circling half of the diagram. “I thought, ‘Holy cow, no one’s done this [computerizing the sales process]!’ And this,” he says, circling the “sales” part of his cost-structure rectangle with the red marker while still rapidly clicking the pen in his left hand, “is [potentially] a $ 10 billion market.”

By his junior year at Stanford, Liemandt had done enough research to know that others were sniffing around the same problem. In his programming classes he learned that Digital Equipment Corp. was using expert systems, an offshoot of artificial intelligence written in something called rule-based programming, in an effort to computerize its own sales configuration. Rule-based programming consists of a series of if/then constructions — if the Hewlett-Packard salesperson changes the printer in the package she’s selling, then the system needs a different kind of cable. If the package uses a different kind of cable, then the price of the entire system changes.

Liemandt could see that rule-based programming was a promising approach. But building a useful mathematical model of a complex product line required so many thousands of if/then equations that the rule-based programming solution, by itself, was unwieldy. In his classes Liemandt learned there was another approach to the configuration problem. A Xerox programmer, Sanjay Mittal, was trying to build inventory and product-line models using what’s called constraint-based equation systems. This kind of math is used in everything from optimizing airlines’ passenger yields to interpreting military satellite photographs. But as it turned out, constraint-based programming wasn’t capable of efficiently handling the large volumes of data required for a workable sales configuration model. The problem remained unsolved.

Joe Liemandt knew that others were working on the problem, and he began to worry that his window was closing. Hewlett-Packard and IBM were pursuing internal projects. These were aimed at creating programs powerful enough to catalog their huge inventories and smart enough to constantly reconfigure product offerings as product lines and prices changed. Joe decided to risk his dad’s ire, abandon his diploma and work full time on sales configuration software. Liemandt convinced four fellow Stanford students to throw in with him. John Lynch dropped out with Liemandt. Christina Jones, Chris Porch and Seth Stratton thought about it, but juggled schoolwork with Trilogy until they graduated. “Their parents hated me,” chuckles Liemandt. “You spend a hundred grand to send your kid to school, and he wants to drop out to work for another kid.” Diploma in hand, Stratton left Trilogy and was replaced in the lineup by Thomas Carter in 1990.

So young Joe Liemandt and his team got to work applying algebraic algorithms similar to ones used by mathematical economists to build general equilibrium models of the economy to create patterns that enable manufacturers to build synthetic models of their product lines. He and his crew spent thousands of hours “writing code” — programming that is — late into the night, sucking down Jolt cola for its caffeine content. Corporate strategy meetings were held across the street at the Old Pro, a Stanford bar, and were fueled by “a lot more beer than Jolt,” Liemandt remembers.

Much of this programming was trial-and-error, but by the time he quit school Liemandt had figured out how to handle thousands of if/them equations in a system that was easy enough to be used by the average salesperson. He would combine the two programming approaches then being experimented with. He would use constraint-based equations to impose some order on the rule-based programming approach DEC was pursuing. Later Liemandt and his team would blend in a third approach, object-oriented programming. Very simply put, this approach enables programmers to organize pieces of software into independent “objects,” or modules. This allows programmers to easily add new information, such as when a product line changes, or to fix errors in the software without shutting down the entire program.

In early 1991 Trilogy’s programming was beginning to jell, but Liemandt received bad news. His father was diagnosed with terminal cancer of the esophagus, and given a year or two to live. Partly to be closer to his parents, Liemandt moved Trilogy, now a 13-person enterprise, to Austin, Tex. Trilogy had by this time created an early version of the software is now sells, and had applied for patents covering its algorithms (two have been granted; three more are on application). But the company still had not sold its product to a single customer.

By moving to Austin, however, Liemandt was able to hire Dave Franke away from research consortium MCC. A heavyweight in computer science, with years of programming experience, Franke, then 38, gave Trilogy some much-needed credibility among the corporate customers Liemandt hoped to reach. One month after Franke came aboard, Hewlett-Packard signed its first contract with Trilogy; a $ 3.5 million deal for sales-configuration software and support services. HP was in effect abandoning its own pursuit and giving the business to Trilogy. “It was the greatest feeling in the world,” Liemandt says of getting HP’s business.

With the nod from HP, other big customers began ordering from Trilogy — Boeing, Silicon Graphics, Alcatel and scores of other high-technology and telecommunications firms. In 1994 erstwhile competitor DEC paid Trilogy’s programmers a high compliment when it began to buy their software.

Lacking this kind of software, the salesperson must serve as a kind of middleman between the client and the company’s engineers, with constant consultations between the sales call and the final order. Further complicating things, different pieces of a manufacturer’s equipment might not work well when hooked up to a customer’s existing equipment, an unpleasantness often discovered only after the order had been delivered. Trilogy software, tying together all the relevant information, greatly shortens and simplifies the process. According to Trilogy, the typical U.S. manufacturing company spends 2% of its gross revenuers to rectify human errors and miscalculations in the configuration process. Saving even half of that would be worth billions of dollars to businesses.

Using Trilogy’s Selling Chain software, a manufacturer loads into the program all the options and product specifications he offers. In effect, he’s turning all his product catalogs into electronic files. Once all this information has been turned into bits and bytes, the salesman can huddle with his customer and ask the company what/if questions. What if my customer links his new Sun workstations to an HP OfficeJet printer-fax-copier, rather than to an HP LaserJet printer? Would that work with the customer’s IBM server? What would it do to the price I can quote him? Does the customer need new connecting cables? Special plugs?

In 1994 Beaverton, Ore.-based Sequent Computer Systems was meeting its sales targets, but was regularly exceeding its cost-of-sales budgets. Robert DeBakker, Sequent’s director of order fulfillment, found the company ($ 540 million revenues) was spending lots of money correcting mistakes that originated in sales configuration. “Come quote time, we’d have a conference room full of catalogs and price books,” says DeBakker, explaining that Sequent customers sometimes received servers without room for the required disk drives, or without connecting cables, or with the wrong kind of preinstalled software. Fixing these mistakes cost Sequent money, time and customer loyalty.

In 1994 DeBakker shelled out about $ 700,000 for Trilogy’s software and services. He says the investment saved Sequent $ 3 million in its first year, and would have saved more had it been implemented sooner. “It made me a hero,” says DeBakker of Trilogy’s software.

Boeing is counting on Trilogy’s software to help it cut costs. A 747 is made up of over 6 million parts, and a customer can choose among hundreds of options. How many seats? What kind of avionics? How many bathrooms? Do you want carbon composite landing gear or steel? Every option the customer chooses affects the availability of other options, and changes the plane’s price. It takes the sales agent days or weeks working with company engineers to make sure all the chosen pieces fit together, renegotiating the price at every step. “It can take 22 trips,” says Doug Frederick, head of information systems for Boeing’s redesign effort. Trilogy’s software sharply cuts that waste of time and resources. The software knows which parts go together and how much they cost. So the salesperson can sit down next to the customer, turn on his laptop and configure the 747, complete with a price quote, in one trip.

Who’s the kid who beat the technology giants to this giant market? Says Wade Monroe, Trilogy’s chief financial officer, and at 54, one of Trilogy’s elder statesmen: “You know how some parents clone their kids to become sports stars? That’s sort of what happened with Joe in business.”

From earliest youth, Joe Liemandt was steeped in business lore. When Joe was a boy in the 1970s, his father, Gregory Liemandt, was the head of planning at General Electric’s components and materials group in Pittsfield, Mass. His boss was an up-and-comer named Jack Welch. Young Joe played hockey with Welch’s son, Mark, spent weekends at the Welches’ and often went on ski trips to Lake Placid with the Welches. Over the years the Welches and Liemandts have remained friends. Joe Liemandt didn’t lack for suitable role models.

In 1983 Greg Liemandt quit GE to run UCCEL in Dallas, a maker of software for mainframe computers, and Joe’s course was set. His mother, Diane, remembers her adolescent son rifling through his father’s briefcase in ssearch of business plans to read. When he was 16, Liemandt spent the summer of 1984 as a programmer in UCCEL’s research and development division, where he learned a lesson he would remember when he started his own company. “They had huge teams of programmers — 50 to 100 people — working on a single project,” Liemandt recalls. “It was a fiasco.” Coordinating the efforts of so many programmers left little time for the actual programming, and projects soon fell apart.

Quick to learn, Joe applied that lesson in his own business. “You need one or two programmers on a project at a time. Any more, and it becomes a nightmare,” he says. Liemandt entered Stanford (chosen, he says, for its proximity to Silicon Valley) in the fall of 1986. He later signed up as an economic major, but spent much of his time taking computer programming calsses and hacking around the computer lab. He knew already that software would be his career, but it wouldn’t be entertainment software. “The product,” he says, “had to be something my dad or Jack Welch would buy.” The something, as it turned out, was sales-configuration software.

An obvious question: Did the example of Harvard’s most famous dropout, Bill Gates, inspire Liemandt’sdecision to leave Stanford early? No, he says, dropping out was “a side effect of, of . . .” he searches for the right word “. . . of a feeling that you’re in a race, and school is something that’s in the way. Nine months is an eternity in software [a reference to the senior year in college he blew off]. Ask Netscape if they’d give up nine months. Nine months out of their browser work, and Netscape isn’t in business today. Somebody else would have done it.”

Starting Trilogy was the easy part. Keeping it going in the early years wasn’t. Liemandt’s father had made about $ 30 million when Computer Associates bought UCCEL in 1987, but Gregory made it clear that he would not finance the vision that lured his son from school. “Outside of me slipping him $ 100 bills in the airport so he would eat,” recalls Diane Liemandt, Joe’s mother, “there was no [family] seed money.” Joe Liemandttried to get Kleiner Perkins and other venture capital firms interested in Trilogy, but even in Silicon Valley the idea of backing a crew of 21-year-olds is a bit hard to swallow. No go. So Liemandt took consulting jobs and began leveraging one credit card against another. “At one point, I had 22 credit cards out there,” he says. “Luckily, I never missed a payment.”

Liemandt and his sidekicks realize that the configuration software business is too good to be ignored by competitors. Trilogy does not have the field to itself. A few smaller competitors have sprung up, but the real threat now comes from larger outfits. European software powers — SAP of Germany ($ 1.9 billion sales) and Baan of the Netherlands ($ 216 million) — have established themselves in automating back-office operations, as had Oracle Corp. Now all three companies have started to make forays into sales automation.

But the astounding successes of Microsoft and Intel have proven that in the computer world the spoils go to the company that grabs the market share early on and keeps it, leaving competitors in the position of always trying to catch up. So it’s ful speed ahead for Trilogy to keep its early high market share as the market grows. “It’s a land grab,” Liemandt says. “Whoever gets the market share and partners first, wins. We’ve got two years until it [the land grab] is over.”

Liemandt says old family friend Jack Welch encouraged him to pull out the growth stops, when Liemandt and his mother recently visited Welch for a weekend in Connecticut. “After talking to Jack, I feel like I’m going half speed,” Liemandt reports. “He tells me, ‘Don’t be such a wuss, Joe.'”

Trilogy draws most of its new hires from the computer science departments of Stanford, MIT, Harvard, Berkeley, Carnegie-Mellon and Rice. While Liemandt can’t match Bill Gates in salary, stock options and name recognition for getting top recruits, he makes up for it by giving the youngsters big projects to run right away. “Here’s more responsibility than you think you can possibly handle — go!” is how Samer Dholakia, 22, a recent Stanford graduate, describes the attractions of working for Trilogy.

Liemandt knows most of the kids he’s hiring are too smart to work for him — or anyone else — for long. “There are a lot of people here to learn how to start a software company,” he says. “That’s great.” He says he’d rather get a few years of boundless entrepreneurial energy from his employees than get many years of mediocre performance.

An inevitable question: When are you going public, Joe? He answers that he’s had 20 calls in the last year from investment bankers drooling to take Trilogy public. “The market’s way overpriced, absolutely,” he says, agreeing that an IPO would probably value Trilogy somewhere around the $ 1 billion mark. But he didn’t spend all those youthful years dreaming about being a businessman for nothing. The earlier he goes public, the more equity he will have to give up. “You’ve got to starve before you give up 51%,” he says. Bill Gates waited 11 years to take Microsoft public, and staying private allowed Gates to weather radical changes in the early software industry without having to worry about quarterly earnings dips.

Anyhow, Liemandt says, “Making 8 zillion dollars is not the win. If that was it, we’d go public tomorrow and cash out. But if we don’t change the way people buy and sell things, then we blew it.” Besides Liemandt, who owns about 60% of Trilogy, otherprincipal shareholders are the Stanford schoolmates remaining from the early days — John Lynch, Chris Porch and Tom Carter. Christina Jones traded her Trilogy holding for a chunk of a Trilogy subisidary that she hopes soon to take public.

Joe Liemandt and his partners are, in a way, the prototype of the new entrepreneur. He is now around the age Bill Gates, Steve Jobs and Michael Dell were when they acquired early success. Liemandt cites a few factors that give youth such an advantage in today’s business. “Young people are in a much better position to take risks, because they don’t have families, mortgages and house payments to take care of. You’ve got to be willing to jump off a cliff for your idea.

Risk is almost an obsession with Joe Liemandt. He likes to visit Las Vegas and the crap tables with associates. He thinks it’s good for morale. “Nothing,” he says, “brings a group of people together like risk.” In 1994 Liemandt bet a Trilogy programmer his blue Lexus that the programmer couldn’t finish a projectg in time for a client proposal. The programmer upped the ante: If Liemandt lost, he would have to fork over his Lexus and drive an Aspire, Ford’s smallest subcompact car. Lexus-less, Liemandt crammed into the Aspire for over a year.

Along with an appetite for risk, Liemandt cites a generational change that makes the computer industry so hospitable to the very young. Computers aren’t something they learned. Computers are what they were brought up with. “Many people graduating from college today have been using computers since their early teens. Kids who have been using the Internet since they were 15 — they’re 25 now, and they’re ten-year Internet experts. [Technology] is changing so fast, there is nobody who has ‘expertise’ in the area. What matters is the ability to learn, adapt and figure out what the answer is. You’ve got to be willing to get in over your head and struggle to make things happen.

“Six months from now, whatever you’re doing, you will have to do something different.” that short sentence could well serve as a credit for today’s aspiring entrepreneur.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Cow stolen, butchered on roadside – PennLive.com

A 1,500-pound cow was stolen and butchered on the side of the road in western Pennsylvania.

State police are now searching for the suspect or suspects, and there is a possible reward for an arrest and conviction.

According to the Pennsylvania State Police at Somerset, the Holstein cow was stolen sometime between 2 and 5 a.m. Saturday from the Pennwood Farms on Sugar Grove School Road outside of Berlin, Somerset County.

Police say the thief or thieves somehow got the cow to the side of the road and sliced its throat. They then butchered the cow, taking its hind quarters, front shoulders and ear tags and left the rest.

Anyone with information should call the police, 814-445-4104.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

From the cow pasture to ESPN GameDay, UCF has come a long way, baby – Orlando Sentinel

Unfortunately, our website is currently unavailable in most European countries. We are engaged on the issue and committed to looking at options that support our full range of digital offerings to the EU market. We continue to identify technical compliance solutions that will provide all readers with our award-winning journalism.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

WRITE TEAM: Small cow, big personality – MyWebTimes.com

“You think you’re special, don’t you?” I ask the diva.

She does not reply, but her eyes say she understands and agrees.

This is Abby, my sister’s sassy queen of a cow. At eight years old, which is getting up there for a cow, I suppose she thinks she is entitled.

And then there are the ribbons and trophies. You see, Abby is a very beautiful cow, and she usually does well at the fairs, so she has quite a collection of awards to her name.

I am pretty sure Abby knows it, too. Last summer, she was named Supreme Champion at a show, so they put a rosette ribbon around her neck. My sister started to lead her back out of the ring, but Abby was enjoying her moment and walked very slowly so everyone could appreciate her and her ribbon.

I took a picture afterwards of my sister smiling and holding the plaque and Abby wearing her ribbon and looking very pleased with herself, somewhat resenting my sister’s presence in the photo.

She likes to throw her weight around when she is walking to the show ring, just to prove she is definitely the one calling the shots. She chooses pace and direction, and that is that. She is not focused on being beautiful as she walks. She plods along and bobs her head in a homely manner. Once in the ring, however, the game changes. She walks elegantly with her head up, her roan hide glistening as she struts her stuff.

When she wins, it never surprises her. When she loses, it is a different story. At the last fair of the season, she was in the running for Supreme Champion again. The judge announced the winner, who was not her, but she was fine with that, because there was still Reserve Supreme. However, she did not get that either, and she tossed her head in disapproval.

This fall I was out taking pictures of the cows in the pasture. Abby seemed to notice me and started posing, as if to say, “OK I’m ready to model for your pictures.”

Lest you think winning and being beautiful is all she cares about, let me tell you another aspect of her personality. She will stand calmly while many little hands reach out to touch her sleek coat at the fairs as children meet a cow up close for the first time. When my fair chores are done for the moment, she makes a warm pillow to lay in the straw and rest with. She chews her cud and I relax at the comforting feeling of a docile cow.

At home, Abby is a nice cow to have around. For one thing, she is our dependable milk cow. When one of us walks out to the pasture to bring her home, she sees us and starts heading home without prompting. She walks into the milking parlor and contentedly gives us milk.

She will let you hug her neck and pet her face and talk to her. She just listens and never talks back (verbally). There is so much intelligence in those pretty dark eyes and so much personality in that small cow.

She knows she is special, but that is OK with me, because she is right.

MARTHA HOFFMAN, who farms in rural Earlville, is a journalism major at Northern Illinois University.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link